Just whining again...into the ether (unspecified rejections)

Good i was starting to think i was the only one not getting faces that i am republishing approved. this whole new policy is SHIT for watch faces.

This is my latest response to developer support at google

GOOGLE YOU ARE FOOLS

THE IS A &&^@o*#$#@$(*y#u WATCH FACE… it is not an app. I

CREATE A p(l#$)(#$u)(#$u CATEGORY FOR WATCHFACES

WE CAN ONLY RECEIVE DATA FROM A WATCH OR A COMPLICATION FROM ANOTHER APP.

In your case, the Health Apps declaration form within Play Console that you have provided for your app is inaccurate as we were not able to find functionalities for all the categories you selected. Please update your app to reflect only the following categories to match your app’s functionalities:

  • Others (Please Specify) What other health features does your app offer?

IF SOMEOWN WOULD REALLY LOOK. I HAVE UNCHECKED OTHER. SO IF I HAVE UNCHECKED OTHER. AND DELETED THE DATA IN THAT FIELD. THEN HOW CAN I HAVE VIOLATED BASED ON "OTHER’ MY APP HAS NO FEATURES. IT DISPLAYS DATA PROVIDED BY OTHER APPS. GLUCODATAHADLER, BLOSE,

Please review and update your selections to ensure accuracy. This includes removing any irrelevant or excessive categories and adding any necessary ones.

You can refer to this page for more details on each category.

You can also read through the “Health Content and Services” of our Health Apps policy page for more details and examples of common violations

AS I HAVE EXPLAINED OUR COUNCIL HAS REVIED YOUR POCLICES FOR THAT APP, THE HEALTH POLICY AND DEVELOPER POLICES AND DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHERE WE ARE IN VIOLATION.

I gave up and just REMADE the exact same watch in WFS 1.6.10 and guess what? It was passed and into production in about 6 hours.

2 Likes