Correctly write multiple 'and' conditions?

Watch Face Studio
1

I wondered about the correct what to write multiple ‘and’ conditions.

Is it:

(cond-1) * (cond-2) * (cond-3)?..

or:

((cond-1) * (cond-2) * (cond-3))?..

Thanks in advance…

1 Like
2

Hello,
Both of them are correct. But it’s better to use the parenthesis ((cond-1) * (cond-2) * (cond-3))

I have tested with this *(([BATT_PER]>10) * ([SC] >100) ( [MON] > 2) ? 1 : 0) and *((([BATT_PER]>10) * ([SC] >100) ( [MON] > 2)) ? 1 : 0). You can try. Let me know if you find any issues with these.
Thank you.

1 Like
3

Hi Boshra - thanks for testing this out and the recommendation. Yes both ways work like a charm :wink:

1 Like
4

Hi guys . I could not get it to work as it stands . I see a Boolean between the Steps and Month conditionals is missing . Some one not realising that will be confused
I encapsulate Formulas with ctrl+E after selecting them as I was taught by Peter or using the </> above .
I always get very confused with WFS * AND and * Multiply .

((([BATT_PER]>10)*([SC]>100)*([MON]>2))?1:0)

6

Thanks for sharing. That was a typo. The right one is ((([BATT_PER]>10) * ([SC] >100) *( [MON] > 2)) ? 1 : 0)

1 Like
7

I think you wrote it right both times. What Russell pointed out, it is good to mark the formulas with multiple * signs in one row as “preformatted text”, otherwise the page recognizes them as formatting signs and does not display them all.

See, the last portion is italic and missing its *
image

Either clamp it between apostrophes or select the formula and hit this button

image
image1311×366 69.1 KB

2 Likes
8

Thank you Peter for the details explanation. I was missing it. Thanks a lot :smiling_face:

2 Likes
9

It will be intresting while the Topic is running to establish how many Boolean operations one can have on one line . I know we can build lines with many Individual Simple Conditionals .